NHD Judging Guidelines and Tips
Follow Us:
Tips and Guidelines
Interview Best Practices
| Thought | Thoughtful Verbal Comment/ Question |
|---|---|
| This work is outstanding. | If you say 鈥淕reat job,鈥 say it to every student. (BE CONSISTENT-DO NOT SHOW FAVORITISM) |
| This is my favorite topic/I love this topic. | 鈥淗ow did you choose your topic?鈥 |
| This project looks professionally made. I wonder if these kids had help. | 鈥淗ow did you create your project?鈥 |
| How could this student possibly have read ALL of these sources? | 鈥淧lease describe your research process. When did you begin gathering and reading your source material?鈥 |
| This project needs so much work. | 鈥淗ow is your project significant in history?鈥 |
Evaluation Form Best Practices
| Thought | Constructive Comment |
|---|---|
| This project needs a lot of work. | You鈥檙e off to a good start. Consider strengthening your project by鈥 |
| Performance is just not your thing but your research is strong. | Your courage at creating a performance is admirable, but another category might enable you to demonstrate your research better. |
| The documentary sound quality was awful. | The audio quality of your documentary distracted from the overall project. Consider testing your audio on different systems and in different settings. |
| Your annotations don鈥檛 tell me whether you鈥檝e even read these sources! | Be careful to use your annotations to explain how you used your sources. |
| Your project does not relate to the theme. | Consider making a stronger case in your process paper for your project鈥檚 relationship to the theme. |
| I don鈥檛 agree with your interpretation. | Reading ___ would have strengthened your entry by providing additional information on which to base your interpretation. OR Historians disagree on interpretation of this topic. Your case would be strengthened by finding additional evidence for ___. |
Disqualification vs. Infraction
| Minor Infraction | Major Infraction | Disqualification | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | A violation that does not provide a competitive advantage. | Exceeding any of the equalizers(time, size, words), thus creating a competitive advantage by being able to provide more information. | The ONLY grounds for this are:
|
| Example | School name on process paper, exceeding word count by 10 words, etc. | Exceeding words by 10+, size by 1 inch+, time by more than 5-10 seconds. | |
| Procedure | Note these in your comments. These violations should not prevent an entry from advancing. Consider them only to break a tie between two entries that are otherwise equal. | Note these in your comments. These entries should NOT advance. If they truly are the best, please consult with NHD staff. | Please do not act on your own. Bring this concern immediately to NHD staff, who will decide if the entry should be removed from competition. |
Sample Questions to Ask
- Why did you pick this topic? What gave you the idea to do this project?
- What was your most important source and why?
- What is the most important point you are trying to convey about your topic?
- What is the most important thing you learned from this project?
- As you did your research, what surprised you the most about the topic?
- What did you find most difficult about doing the research for your entry?
- How did your primary sources help you understand the topic?
- How did you come up with the script or design for your entry?
- What were the most important consequences of the person/event?
- Why is this topic significant in history?
- Is there something you were not asked but would like to talk about?
Questions NOT to Ask
- Do NOT ask about their school, hometown, family background or economic resources.
- Do NOT comment on their appearance.
- Do NOT ask students questions designed to trap or embarrass them鈥
- 鈥漌hy didn鈥檛 you read the most important book about (your topic)?鈥
- 鈥淗ow could you leave out/ignore鈥?鈥
- 鈥淲hat makes you think you are entitled to write about this?鈥
ALSO TO BE AVOIDED (REMINDER)鈥
- Do NOT lecture students about their topics.
- Do NOT tell student how their project compares to the others or overall.
- Do NOT express your opinion about the topic.
On the Judging 鈥淔loor鈥
Procedure for Each Entry
- Introduce yourselves and say 鈥渉ello.鈥
- Explain the process to the student.
- Ask for and read the process paper and annotated bibliography.
- Ask the students to begin (documentary, performance) or begin viewing the exhibit.
- Keep the time using the timer provided (NOT your cell phone).
- Conduct the interview.
- Thank the student(s).
- Take notes as you go鈥 in pencil.
- Stay on schedule!
*Paper and Website Judges 鈥 Please skip steps three and four (You have already examined these entries.)
Tips for Evaluation Form Comments
- Avoid language that implies actual ranking or are just flattery.
- Bad Examples:
- 鈥淔antastic performance - best one today! Good job!鈥
- 鈥淭his performance deserves a top award.鈥
- Good Examples:
- 鈥淰ery nicely assembled documentary that is interesting and a pleasure to view. Your project is supported by a strong research base. Especially impressive are your interviews and primary sources.鈥
- Bad Examples:
- Reframe from negative comments that can be rephrased positively.
- Consider individual circumstance and student鈥檚 access to resources.
- Make sure the comments and the checkbox rankings are consistent. It is confusing to a student to receive an excellent check, but only negative comments or vice versa.
- Use specific criticisms backed up by examples. Give the student an action plan for improvement.
- Bad Examples:
- 鈥淵ou misspelled so many words on the exhibit.鈥
- 鈥淵ou relied too much on two sources鈥
- Good Examples:
- 鈥淎lthough you have a good thesis statement, be sure to incorporate the theme words 鈥淭urning Point鈥 throughout your key points. You must make the case for the connection to your theme.鈥
- Bad Examples:
